迷你词

以文会友

COVID-19 刺激立法是否因佩洛西而延迟?

| 暂无评论

总统一再指责美国众议院议长不关心美国人,因为她不同意他的 COVID-19 救济援助条件。

【宣称】

由于美国众议院议长南希·佩洛西,联邦政府没有在 2020 年秋季批准 COVID-19 经济救济一揽子计划。

【结论】

混合物

【原文】

U.S. Election Day is Nov. 3, 2020. Check your state’s vote-by-mail options. Browse our coverage of candidates and the issues. And just keep fact-checking.

After a months-long political debate over how to address America’s pandemic-stricken economy and just 13 days before the 2020 presidential election, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office announced she and U.S. President Donald Trump’s top emissary, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, were inching toward an agreement on a new economic stimulus package.

“Both sides are serious about finding a compromise,” tweeted Drew Hammill, a spokesperson for Pelosi, on Oct. 20.

The announcement came after repeated claims by Trump that Pelosi was the sole roadblock in his administration’s plans to spend about $1.8 trillion on unemployment benefits, schools, and other initiatives — adding to $3 trillion in emergency relief that the federal government approved in spring 2020. In a nationally televised town hall on Oct. 15, for instance, Trump said of Pelosi:

“We are ready to sign and pass stimulus, but she’s got to approve it,” he said. “She’s penalizing our people. I’m ready to sign a big, beautiful stimulus.”

All of that said, the Democrat-approved plan overlapped in some areas with the White House’s proposal to help small businesses and pay each eligible U.S. citizen a one-time $1,200 check.

But this was key: Trump’s GOP allies in the Senate were skeptical of any proposal greater than $1 trillion. For months, they had debated economic stimulus measures smaller than the White House’s initial proposal of about $1.6 trillion, which later grew to $1.8 trillion before Trump said he wanted to spend more than Democrats. Reuters reported: “Senate Republicans have repeatedly stated their opposition to additional COVID-19 relief spending near the $2 trillion mark and have focused instead on smaller initiatives.”

The Republicans were focusing on one-off initiatives to help businesses and families instead of a comprehensive spending bill. They supported one measure in particular that totaled about $650 billion in emergency economic relief, or about one-third the amount of Trump’s proposal.

In other words, the disagreement over funding was not along party lines, with Senate Republicans taking Trump’s side and Pelosi leading an oppositional force, like most political battles over Trump’s first term. Rather, key Republicans were skeptical of a relief package greater than $1 trillion and had not expressed support for the White House’s proposal.

As proof of that lack of enthusiasm for Trump’s COVID-19 spending plan, the leading GOP vote-counter, Sen. John Thune, told reporters on Oct. 19 that “it’d be hard” to find the necessary Republican support to pass the $1.8 trillion package.

Additionally, multiple news reports said McConnell told Senate Republicans the following day that he had advised the White House against making any deal with Pelosi before the election — significant evidence that the House Speaker was not the only barrier to a compromise. The New York Times reported:

Mr. McConnell’s counsel, confirmed by three Republicans familiar with his remarks, threw cold water on Mr. Trump’s increasingly urgent push to enact a fresh round of pandemic aid before he faces voters on Nov. 3. It underscored the divisions within the party that have long hampered a compromise.

Republicans are growing increasingly anxious that Mr. Trump and his team are too eager to reach a multitrillion-dollar agreement and are conceding far too much to the Democrats. Republicans fear that scenario would force their colleagues up for re-election into a difficult choice of defying the president or alienating their fiscally conservative base by embracing the big-spending bill he has demanded.

The Washington Post added:

Many Senate Republicans oppose a massive new spending bill and McConnell is not eager to hold a vote that would divide his conference just before the election, when most Senate Republicans want attention focused on the Barrett nomination. […]

McConnell’s remarks Tuesday indicate that even if Pelosi and Mnuchin do manage to reach a deal, any vote in the Senate would wait until after the election. If Democrats win a number of seats in the November elections, they could seize control of the Senate beginning in January.

Nonetheless, if or when Pelosi and Mnuchin reached an agreement, Trump suggested on multiple occasions without evidence that he could convince naysayers to agree to whatever he wanted. “He’ll be on board if something comes,” Trump said of McConnell’s reluctance in the Fox News interview. “Not every Republican agrees with me, but they will.”

The time window for an agreement before the Nov. 3 election was narrowing as of this report. Hammill, the spokesman for Pelosi, on Oct. 20 tweeted that Mnuchin and Pelosi had a 45-minute conversation earlier in the day that showed they were “serious about finding a compromise” and moving closer to an agreement in the coming days or weeks with the help of congressional committee chairs.

In sum, considering McConnell, the Senate Majority leader, had reportedly told the White House to not make a deal with Pelosi — proof that the House Speaker was not the only barrier to an agreement — as well as a comment by another Senate Republican that “it’d be hard” to rally his colleagues around Trump’s plan for emergency economic spending, we rate this claim a “Mixture” of truth and falsehoods.

Snopes.com
Since 1994
Help Supercharge Snopes For 2020

We have big plans. We need your help.

发表评论

*为必填字段!